Wednesday, December 13, 2006

You’re a good man Governor Pataki:

With the days of the Pataki era winding down, I thought I would take a moment to do something no one else is, say thank you.

In an age of immediate gratification, Americans today seem to barely remember last week let alone 12 years ago. When Pataki first ran for Governor in 1994, New Yorkers were a fed up bunch. Crime in the State was high. I remember as a teenager in Queens, to hear someone was mugged, their house robbed or car stolen was no big shocker. So it was no big surprise that one of the main reasons Pataki defeated Governor Cuomo was because crime had just gotten out of control.

By now most New Yorkers have forgotten the popular case of Arthur Shawcross who after killing two young children was allowed to get a plea bargain where he ended up serving just 15 out of a 25 year sentence. The real story that shocked New Yorkers was that after his release he went on to claim a dozen new victims. It was this story and the personal experiences like the one I shared above that gave Pataki the edge and why the death penalty issue, which no one understands how today, was front and center.

After Gov. Pataki’s 12 years in office, crime in New York State has declined a whopping 47% since his election in 1994. In the Queens neighborhood I still live today, to hear about a mugging or robbery would bring shock to peoples faces.

Besides leading over a major drop in crime, Governor Pataki is leaving us with a State that has experienced economic prosperity. Despite the challenges of upstate New York, overall the State’s unemployment rate is at record lows and the values of New Yorker’s property are at record highs. Today Long Island is home to a large upper middle class with more construction under way. Though Gov. Pataki shouldn’t take full responsibility, as leader of the State who would ultimately get full blame if the opposite were to occur, he should get a big pat on the back for where we are today.

Besides lower crime and a growing economy there are other events under Governor Pataki that shouldn’t be forgotten. It was Governor Pataki who signed into law the Family Health Plus plan that provides health care for low-income families.

When it came to the environment he preserved countless acres of land statewide and his 1996 Safe Drinking Water Act is something every New Yorker should be thankful for and by far his most underappreciated achievement. Thanks to this policy New Yorkers and future ones will enjoy clean water for decades.

Governor Pataki may not be perfect but what he did was leave New York better then he found it, something his predecessor couldn’t claim. As Spitzer steps forward and takes control all I can say is he has some big shoes to fill.

10 Comments:

At 11:25 AM, Anonymous keith r. said...

It's unfortunate he couldn't control the size of government. The budget is out of control.

I wonder what it would have been like with Faso in 1994.

 
At 12:19 PM, Blogger Jen Saunders said...

I'd wager to guess he'd have been out in '98. His views are too socially conservative for this state.

 
At 12:31 PM, Blogger Mike Salomon said...

I guess you have never been upstate Jen (beyond Westchester).

I would say his social views are in line with most of upstate excluding former city dwellers.

 
At 12:53 PM, Blogger Jen Saunders said...

Actually, I spent a lot of time in Syracuse as a child. If those views were the majority of the state, he wouldn't have had such a pitiful showing in this past election. Also, Hillary would not be our senator.

 
At 2:31 PM, Blogger Mike Salomon said...

I didn't think so.

I think that is a very superficial assumption about what led to that outcome. I know that some conservatives upstate viewed Spitzer as someone who stood up to Wall Street and translated that into protecting their pensions. I think Republicans did a poor job showing how liberal Spitzer actually is. Couple that with lack of name recognition of Faso, Republicans were doomed. Leading up to the finish line 3 out of 4 NYers didn't even know Faso.

Many people also were upset with scandal plagued Republicans nationwide. With that being said, I think someone is more likely to vote for someone that they think is a good person with different views, rather than someone who they think has their same views but they don't know what they will get from them.

Although my reference was about upstate.I knew conservatives that had voted for Hillary because they figured with her start power she could do more for NY. Also, they believed her spiel about the 200,000 jobs.

In the end, one of the main issues for upstaters was jobs/economy. They believed that the Republicans were to blame for failing to deliver to them.

I don't think this election had to do much with social issues, at least in upstate New York.

 
At 3:42 PM, Blogger Jen Saunders said...

Even if those other issues did not exist, Faso still would not have won. We do not live in Alabama. What the GOP in NY has to understand, as CA finally learned with Arnold, is that to win statewide, you need a candidate with broader appeal. Someone who is very socially conservative will scare away swing voters, and neither party can win without getting . I have many friends who are fiscally conservative but vote democrat because they are scared away by anti-gay, anti-choice rhetoric from Republicans.

 
At 3:46 PM, Anonymous The Candle Man said...

The attitude of people like Mike Salomon who can't grasp the cultural demographics of this state need to take a back seat and become the minority Northeast Republican view. If not, we will continue to lose.

 
At 4:21 PM, Blogger Mike Salomon said...

How can I not "grasp the cultural demographics"?

Show me where I said "New York State as a whole has strict conservative views"! All I said were the general views of non-ex-city types of upstate above westchester. That did not include the greater NYC region and long island. I only talk about what I know.

And also, by anything I have said, you cannot tell around which part of the Republican tent that I fall. All you can gather from what I have said is that I am open to all views and understand how each arrives at them.

Therefore, I think your candle has melted.

 
At 4:32 PM, Anonymous The Candle Man said...

Mike Solomon Wrote: "I would say his social views are in line with most of upstate excluding former city dwellers."

His anti-choice views are not in line with the majority of upstate dwellers, especially women.

Upstate New York is looking more like rural New England, not John Faso's Alabama social conservative mentality.

 
At 8:59 AM, Blogger Jen Saunders said...

Mike, you might want to go back and look at your first comment, I think you'll see Candle Man has a point.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home